北望经济学园问学区公共经济学 试任板斧感言[原创]

1  /  1  页   1 跳转 查看:4551

试任板斧感言[原创]

试任板斧感言[原创]

试任板斧感言

近年底,圣诞节的气氛益浓,手头的工作也告一段落。正在收拾桌面,把文献归档,把要还的书整理出来,还要整理新主题的资料。重庆森林里有一段梁朝伟-663收拾屋子、转换跑道、准备迎接新室友的镜头,跟我现在的情形也差不多。

感谢大家的参与和北望的支持,儒家制度主义从北望学园改版起,已经撑了半年,但终究有些务虚多过务实。原本是想探讨原教旨主义的儒家思想-即孔子/公羊家-如何可能改变社会的集体认知,然后产生社会/制度变迁,但是,这是个大问题,更迫切的是需要来自实证的支持。我个人目前的兴趣是在社会组织方面,它与公共经济学的关系倒是非常的暧昧。后者也是这一兴趣的缘起,无论是理论的还是问题的。

藉是之故,对公共经济学这个版子我也颇留意,并且贴过一些不成样的东西,私下里受ZFB兄许多赞扬,更添了许多兴趣。适逢岳兄要专心写毕业论文,怕这个版慢慢荒芜了,便向北望兄揽了这个板斧。至于斑竹,虚位以待,盼有专长的同学来担当。我自己则抱着多敲边鼓多学习的态度,试任一段时间板斧,还盼大家支持。如果做得不好,那就多扔鸡蛋西红柿吧。

回到公共经济学,这其实是一个很有意思的应用经济学,也是很有现实意义的。从自己的知识背景来看,至少有几个理论或问题与之相关:

1,公共选择理论,似乎在具体问题上更关心财政支出、社会福利的目标、效率、平等和约束等等;
2,公共财政理论,税收理论与问题是经典, 财政的分散化则是热点;
3,市场规制,特别是垄断性或公共行业的规制与竞争问题。垄断性行业的形成往往赖于国家特定的政策及补贴,并且直接涉及公共利益-福利的增减或公共目标的选择,所以也当然的属于公共经济学的范畴。垄断与反垄断就成了公共经济学的主题之一;
4,公共经济的制度变迁与制度设计。大家熟悉的OSTROM和公地问题就属于这一题目;
5, 非赢利组织。

既然是应用经济学,就可以将许多基础理论延伸进来。比如科斯定理,比如信任问题,等等。下面这个网站的工作论文很好的展示了这种情况。http://papers.nber.org/papersbyprog/PE.html

与之对照,我们可以发现,国内做的研究太不足,范围和深度都远远不够,也不敢把许多大家更喜欢讨论的基础理论应用过来检验之修正之。结果,基础理论流于空谈的多,因为缺乏实证和产业数据的支持而无力创新;具体的产业研究又总跳不出陈旧理论与模式,对政策贡献不大。自然的,学术在低水平徘徊,政策亦然。人民便要因此继续忍受无知和旧制的痛苦。为学如此,岂能坐视?

663说,一架飞机上,一定有一位空中小姐是你想泡的。公共经济学的广阔天地也是最适合年轻经济学人成长历练的,去找那个小题目,小问题,然后付诸微言大义。

2002 圣诞将至,谨志。



[此贴子已经被kielboat于2002-12-13 5:24:59编辑过]

 

latest working papers of public economics

*( 1 )  Cross-Border Shopping in a Federalist Economy
        Vander LUCAS
*( 2 )  On the optimality of search matching equilibrium when workers are
       risk averse
        Etienne LEHMANN & Bruno VAN DER LINDEN
*( 3 )  Fiscal Harmonization and Portfolio Choice
        Philippe Monfort & Aude Pommeret
*( 4 )  Auctions for Government Securities: A Laboratory Comparison of
       Uniform, Discriminatory and Spanish Designs
        Klaus Abbink & Jordi Brandts & Paul Pezanis-Christou
*( 5 )  Assisting the Long-Term Unemployed: Results from a Randomized
       Trial
        Breunig, Robert & Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. & Dunlop, Yvonne &
       Terrill, Marion
*( 6 )  Tax Evasion and the Source of Income
        Klarita Gërxhani & Arthur Schram
*( 7 )  Environmental Tax Reform and Double Dividend
        Roberto Patuelli & Eric Pels & Peter Nijkamp
*( 8 )  Fairness and Reciprocity in the Hawk-Dove Game
        Tibor Neugebauer & Anders Poulsen & Arthur J.H.C. Schram

---------

*(1)

Cross-Border Shopping in a Federalist Economy


  Vander LUCAS (UNIVERSITE CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN, Institut de
    Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES), Universidade Catolica de
    Brasilia,Brazil)


Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to consider an economy in which
  incorporates cross-border shopping and where the different levels of
  government worry about the well-being of their citizens. We assume a
  federalist economy with a central government and two regions with
  specific characteristics. Two kinds of externalities, horizontal and
  vertical, arise and we show the possibilities to internalise them.
  With the governments of symmetric regions behaving as Nash players
  they would optimally set their tax rate and replicate the unitary
  nation optimum. Finally, we show how the central government as a
  Stackelerg leader can adjust its fiscal instruments so that the tax
  externalities are also internalised.

JEL Codes: H3 H77 H21 R2
Keywords: Cross-Border Shopping; Commodity Tax Competition; Fiscal Federalism

Downloads:
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ctl:louvir:2002018


Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES) Discussion Paper / Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES)

*(2)

On the optimality of search matching equilibrium when workers are
  risk averse


  Etienne LEHMANN (Creuset, Université de Saint-Etienne, and
    Eurequa, Université Paris 1 and Ermes, Université Paris 2) ; Bruno
    VAN DER LINDEN (FNRS - Belgium and UNIVERSITE CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN,
    Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES) - Belgium)


Abstract: This papers revisits the normative properties of search-matching
  economies when workers have concave utility functions. A general
  equilibrium framework is developed where agents are homogeneous and
  wages are bargained over. Assuming lump-sum taxation of profits, the
  optimal allocation of resources is characterized first when
  information is perfect and second when unemployed people freely
  choose their search effort. Compared to the first case, the optimum
  is characterized by imperfect unemployment insurance and lower levels
  of search intensity and output in the second setting. To decenralize
  these optima, employees should be unable to extract a rent when
  information is perfect. An appropriate positive rent is however
  needed in the second case. When the bargaining power of the workers
  is given, these outcomes can be implemented through a well-designed
  non-linear tax schedule and an appropriate level of unemployment
  benefits. According to the level of the bargaining power, taxation
  can be progressive or regressive. Negative marginal tax rates are
  even needed for sufficiently low levels of the bargaining power.

JEL Codes: J64 J65 J68 H21 D82
Keywords: Unemployment, Non-linear Taxation, Unemployment Benefits, Moral Hazard, Search, Matching

Downloads:
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:ctl:louvir:2002023


Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES) Discussion Paper / Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES)

*(3)

Fiscal Harmonization and Portfolio Choice


  Philippe Monfort  ; Aude Pommeret


Abstract: In this paper, we consider a two-country model based on Svensson
  (1989) in order to analyze how fiscal harmonization impacts on
  economic growth and welfare through its effects on agents portfolio
  decisions in an uncertain world. We derive the conditions under which
  fiscal harmonization proves to be welfare enhancing and analyse how
  the set of initial tax rates leading to a welfare improving
  harmonization is affected by uncertainty and assets returns
  correlation. In particular, the results obtained suggest that the
  probability for tax harmonization to be welfare improving is first
  increasing and then decreasing with uncertainty while it
  monotonically decreases with the correlation between the assets
  returns shocks.

JEL Codes: E62 F21 F41 H22 O16
Keywords: fiscal harmonization; growth; uncertainty

Downloads:
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:lau:crdeep:02.16


Cahiers de Recherches Economiques du Département d'Econométrie et d'Economie politique (DEEP) / Université de Lausanne, Ecole des HEC, DEEP

*(4)

Auctions for Government Securities: A Laboratory Comparison of
  Uniform, Discriminatory and Spanish Designs


  Klaus Abbink  ; Jordi Brandts  ; Paul Pezanis-Christou


Abstract: The Bank of Spain uses a unique auction format to sell
  government bonds, which can be seen as a hybrid of a uniform and a
  discriminatory auction. For winning bids above the average winning
  bid, buyers are charged the average winning bid, otherwise they pay
  their respective bids. We report on an experiment that compares this
  auction format to the discriminatory format, used in most other
  countries, and to the uniform format. Our design is based on a common
  value model with multi-unit supply and two-unit demand. The results
  show significantly higher revenue with the Spanish and the uniform
  formats than with the discriminatory one, while volatility of prices
  over time is significantly lower in the discriminatory format than in
  the Spanish and uniform cases. Actual price dispersion is
  significantly larger in the discriminatory than in the Spanish. Our
  data also exhibit the use of bid-spreading strategies in all three
  designs.

JEL Codes: C92 D44 E42 E58 H63
Keywords: Treasury, Spanish auctions, discriminatory auctions, uniform auctions, multi-unit demand, common values, experimental economics

Downloads:
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:aub:autbar:551.02


UFAE and IAE Working Papers / Unitat de Fonaments de l'Anàlisi Econòmica (UAB) and Institut d'Anàlisi Econòmica (CSIC)

*(5)

Assisting the Long-Term Unemployed: Results from a Randomized
  Trial


  Breunig, Robert (RSSS, Australian National University) ;
    Cobb-Clark, Deborah A. (SPEAR, Australian National University and IZA
    Bonn) ; Dunlop, Yvonne (Victoria University of Technology) ; Terrill,
    Marion (Department of Family and Community Services)


Abstract: Welfare reform in Australia centres on the concept of both
  economic and social participation. The policy concern is that people
  who fail to participate in economic and social life may become
  entrenched in disadvantage. In 2000 - 2001, a randomized trial was
  conducted by the Department of Family and Community Services in order
  to assess whether an intensive interview with successive follow-ups
  would result in increased economic and social participation for
  unemployed individuals who had been on income support for more than
  five years. We find evidence that participation in the trial led to a
  reduction in average weekly hours of work, but increased the amount
  of hours spent in study or training programs and the proportion of
  individuals engaged in such programs. We also find evidence of
  increased social integration associated with participation in the
  trial.

JEL Codes: H3 I38 J68
Keywords: active labor market programs, counseling and monitoring, long-term unemployment, propensity score matching, welfare reform

Downloads:
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEc:iza:izadpsp628


IZA Discussion Papers / Institute for the Study of Labor (IZA)

*(6)

Tax Evasion and the Source of Income


  Klarita Gërxhani (Faculty of Economics and Econometrics,
    University of Amsterdam) ; Arthur Schram (Faculty of Economics and
    Econometrics, University of Amsterdam)


Abstract: A series of experiments in Albania and the Netherlands give us
  the opportunity to compare behavioral patterns related to tax
  evasion. Subjects have to decide between a random 'registered'
  income, the realization of which will be known to the experimenter
  for sure, and a random 'unregistered' income that will only be known
  to the experimenter with some (audit) probability. After the actual
  income has been determined, subjects have to report it and pay taxes
  accordingly. If they are audited, there is a fine for underreporting.
  This experiment was organized (separately) among high school pupils,
  high school teachers, university students, university teachers and
  university (non-academic) staff, in Albania and the Netherlands. The
  results show that (i) when tax evasion is possible, subject choose
  unregistered income more frequently; (ii) many subjects are willing
  to choose an income that allows for tax evasion but report their
  income honestly anyway; (iii) compliance increases with the audit
  probability; (iv) individual decisions to choose a type of income
  (registered vs. unregistered) and to evade taxes are made
  simultaneously; (v) Albanians evade taxes less than the Dutch do;
  (vi) pupils and students evade taxes more than teachers and personnel
  do; (vii) the differences across groups within a country are at least
  as large as the differences between the two countries. Finally, we
  argue that the distinct levels of tax evasion outside of the
  laboratory in the two countries are not attributable to different tax
  attitudes or cultures, but to different tax institutions and the way
  individuals have learned to deal with them.

JEL Codes: C91 H26 O17 O57
Keywords: Tax evasion; Cross-country studies; Experiments.

Downloads:
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEcgr:uvatin:20020098


Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers / Tinbergen Institute

*(7)

Environmental Tax Reform and Double Dividend


  Roberto Patuelli (Ravenna, Italy) ; Eric Pels (Vrije
    Universiteit Amsterdam) ; Peter Nijkamp (Vrije Universiteit
    Amsterdam)


Abstract: In this paper we offer a meta-analysis approach to (simulation)
  studies on environmental tax reform (ETR). The underlying studies
  look both at environmental effects (e.g. reduction in CO2 emission)
  and economic effects (e.g. change in gross domestic product)
  following such a tax reform. The statistical results suggest that the
  tax type, the recycling-policy and the economic model used in the
  simulations are all of influence on the chance a double dividend can
  be obtained. The results are however not entirely conclusive
  regarding the question which combination of policies and models will
  lead to a higher double dividend. Our meta-analytic experiment also
  shows that the specific definition of the double dividend (partly)
  determines the outcome. These findings should be taken into
  consideration applying an ETR, to prevent a situation where ETR is
  rejected or accepted solely due to characteristics of the underlying
  simulation study rather than the intrinsic ETR itself.

JEL Codes: H20 Q48
Keywords: environmental tax reform; double dividend; meta analysis.

Downloads:
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEcgr:uvatin:20020095


Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers / Tinbergen Institute

*(8)

Fairness and Reciprocity in the Hawk-Dove Game


  Tibor Neugebauer (University of Hannover) ; Anders Poulsen
    (Aarhus School of Business, Denmark) ; Arthur J.H.C. Schram
    (University of Amsterdam)


Abstract: We study fairness and reciprocity in a Hawk-Dove game. This
  alllows us to test various models in one framework. We observe a
  large extent of selfish and rational behavior. Our results are
  inconsistent with leading models in this field.

JEL Codes: C72 C92 H41 D44
Keywords: Hawk-Dove game; reciprocity; fairness.

Downloads:
http://d.repec.org/n?u=RePEcgr:uvatin:20020094


Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers / Tinbergen Institute
 

感谢k兄在关键时候援手,这个社区自草创之日起就得到kielboat的鼎立支持,北望不才,且心有旁骛,虽有一腔热心,但对许多论题心有余力不足,自责之余也由衷感谢各位朋友的帮助,尤其是k兄,除了积极参与讨论,还给我们提供了许多国外宝贵的资源,现在还要负责两个版面,实在令北望心有不安!
接近罗老师对汪丁丁先生的感觉,我也我只有作k兄学生的份,亦师亦友,却自有一番乐趣。

k兄对公共经济学中国现实意义上“应用”功能之把握我很赞同,而且我感兴趣的主题也不会超过他列出来的这5项
跟着k兄这个帖子,我也谈谈我对公共经济学的一些不成熟的看法。

我一向秉承经济学自由主义传统,相信市场的力量,我甚至是自由至上的,也和张五常一样认为市场从来不会失灵,但问题是人类的许多行为不能形成市场,那自然也不能指望市场解决,所以科斯定理之外有霍布斯定理。
经济学是研究人类行为的学科,那么除了市场中的人的行为,还要研究非市场环境中人的行为,这大概有又为两块,一是企业,二是政府,
经济学基本是围绕这市场、企业、政府转的,贝克尔以后后继者对家庭、犯罪等的研究以及现在这个论坛部分主题谈的社会资本、非货币交换等都是对经济学研究领域的拓宽,正如汪丁丁的观点(ccer演讲,2002)——从行为学和神学角度对经济学划界后,在人类行为的集合中,大约小于1%的领域,才是经济学应该研究的领域。
企业理论自科斯以降发展到今天已经非常显眼,成为炙手可热的分支,新制度经济学在中国的明星待遇大概也与此相关,但是我一直认为对中国人行为影响最大的恰恰主要不在于市场,也不在于企业,而在于政府。
中国在历史上始终没有发育出成熟的市场,呈现成一种“过密化”(involution,亦译为内卷)特征,近代兴起的企业也主要集中于政府采办或干脆是官商,这种官商在解放前是官僚资本主义,在解放后是计划经济,中国原本就有官商的传统和其发展的天然土壤,只是不同时代赋予其不同的表现罢了!
在计划经济时代人们的行为几乎尽可能的都被纳入公共领域,计划经济转变到市场经济这种制度变迁本身是政府主导的,记得《南方周末》看过一篇文章,其中有一句话十分到位—我们的改革实质就是政府逐渐退出的过程。从经验上这方面的案例也是极为丰富的,《南方周末》上那篇文章描述的就是南方某城市放开城市户籍制度的改革试验,k博士说大有作为确实是当真如此!

张宇燕和何帆博士曾经合作写过一篇关于财政压力导致制度变迁的文章——主要观点也反映在后来何帆先生的博士论文中了,我曾不以为然,认为这不过是诺斯悖论的中国套用,现在看来其实不然,在历史和逻辑的统一之处此种解释毕竟是经得住拷问的。

因此我接触经济学伊始,就对研究公共决策领域的公共选择学派有莫大的兴趣,曾手抄介绍性小册子钱翔等著的《公共选择理论》(大众普及经济学系列)一本,并看了文建东的《公共选择学派》、李军的《中国公共经济初论》这些国内较早的介绍性书籍,我的本科论文便是公用事业单位改革方面,用的基本框架较多借鉴了公共选择学派的理论,我曾一度希望通过对中国近代本土传播方式的经济史考察理出一条人们在公共空间活动的线索,从而得出一个一般性的结论,但是这现在还只是一个问题。

从学理上看,我也认为从公共经济学出发可以得到一个理解经济学的好线索,此处偷懒,我将以前的一个文献综述有关部分摘录出来(主要参考了张培刚《微观经济学的发展》):
由林达尔的理论谈起(一个研究经济学的线索)

早在上个世纪末,奥地利和意大利学者将边际效用价值论运用到财政学科研究上,论证了政府和财政在市场经济运行中的合理性、互补性,形成了公共产品理论。
1919年产生的林达尔均衡是公共产品理论最早的成果之一,林达尔认为公共产品价格并非取决于某些政治选择机制和强制性税收,恰恰相反,每个个人都面临着根据自己意愿确定的价格,并均可按照这种价格购买公共产品总量。处于均衡状态时,这些价格使每个人需要的公用产品量相同,并与应该提供的公用产品量保持一致。因为每个人购买并消费了公用产品的总产量,按照这些价格的供给恰好就是各个个人支付价格的总和。林达尔均衡使人们对公共产品的供给水平问题取得了一致,即分摊的成本与边际收益成比例。总之,林达尔均衡指个人对公共产品的供给水平以及它们之间的成本分配进行讨价还价,并实现讨价还价的均衡。
萨缪尔逊1954年、1955年分别发表的“公共支出的纯粹理论”和“公共支出理论的图式探讨”提出并部分的解决了公共产品理论的一些核心问题,如:如何用分析的方法定义集体消费产品?怎样描述生产公共产品所需资源的最佳配置的特征。他在“公共支出的纯粹理论”一文中将公共产品定义为这样一种产品:每一个人对这种产品的消费并不减少任何他人也对这种产品的消费。这一描述成为经济学关于纯粹的公共产品的经典定义。
1956年蒂鲍特(C.M.tiebout)发表了论文“一个地方支出的纯理论”,随即出现了大量关于地方公共产品的文献,地方公共产品问题指:一些公共产品只有居住在特定地区的人才能享用,因此个人可以通过迁居,来选择他消费的公共产品。
布坎南在1965年的“俱乐部的经济理论”中首次对非纯公共产品(准公共产品)进行了讨论,公共产品的概念得以拓宽,认为只要是集体或社会团体决定,为了某种原因通过集体组织提供繁荣物品或服务,便是公共产品。
同年,贝冢(K.Kaizuka)最先引入了公共产品要素的概念。
1969年,萨缪尔逊指出对林达尔均衡理论提出了批评,指出:因为每个人都有将其真正边际支付愿望予以支付的共同契机,所以林达尔均衡产生的公共产品供给均衡水平将会远低于最优水平。
1973年,桑得莫(A.Sandom)发表了“公共产品与消费技术”。着重从消费技术角度研究了混合产品(准公共产品)。
70年代以后,公共产品理论的的发展主要集中在设计机制保证公共产品的决策者提供的效率原则。
主要有两种思路:一是将公共产品攻击的决定诉诸政治程序,用公众投票方式解决,如布坎南及其“公共选择学派”,他们使公共产品理论研究的领域得以拓宽,研究非市场决策,发展了公共选择理论。还有一种思路是设计一种计划程序诱导个人会基于自己的利益而真实显示其对公共产品的偏好即激励机制设计问题,克拉克和格罗夫斯等人对后一思路进行了大胆探讨。

关于最优税制的研究在上个世纪70年代达到了一个高潮,米尔利丝、戴尔蒙、鲍莫、迪克塞等现在的大师级人物都参与其中,并获得了承认,96年的诺奖颁给了最优税制,而公共选择理论也当仁不让的获得了诺奖。

还想说点,可惜太晚了,先睡觉了!
 
1  /  1  页   1 跳转

版权所有 北望经济学园  北望博客  Sitemap

Powered by Discuz!NT 2.1.202    Copyright © 2001-2012 Comsenz Inc.
Processed in 0.078125 second(s) , 4 queries. 京ICP备05006035号
返顶部