北望经济学园学者专区回家的路 丁丁北京大学社会思想研究班论坛

1  /  17  页   12345678» 跳转 查看:57128

丁丁北京大学社会思想研究班论坛

丁丁北京大学社会思想研究班论坛

报名参加2003年秋季北京大学社会思想研究班的同学,请在这里发表对阅读文献的评论和主题报告的提纲。我也会把上课的日期和时间公布在这里。CCER根据大学方面的规则不对50人以下的课程配备助教。可是,目前报名超过了55人,现在很难判断开学一个月后的情况。所以,我们先请CCER的胡蛟同学担任这个研究班的义务助教。同学们可以直接与他联系,地址:econer@163.com 以及:huj@ccermail.net
从下面的目录内选择了主题的同学,请通过电子信箱告诉胡蛟或我本人,并在这里发布你的选题,等候三天,若无其他同学提出争议,你就可以从我这里领取论文了。2000年以前发表的论文,尺寸可能超过3MB,故需较大的信箱。2000年以后发表的论文,尺寸较小,通常不超过500KB,一般的信箱足够接收。
我们非常需要有三位同学选择第一个主题,因为第一次讨论迫在眉睫,准备时间较少,至今无人敢来应召,咖啡激励看来不够强烈?若9月7日仍无同学认领该主题,我们将不得不考虑把开课的时间到10月假期之后。

我们研究班同学的论坛,为了免于网络故障,除此处外,还有“经纬网”---www.jingwei.org,是浙大跨学科中心主持的网站。希望大家也在那里注册和参与讨论。

北望,可否将此栏目锁定在论坛的顶端,到明年1月再取消。


[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-3 20:10:16编辑过]





[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-3 20:16:49编辑过]





[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-4 7:56:18编辑过]

 

下面分段贴出社会思想研究班的阅读目录及说明:
第一部分:
社会思想研究班
阅读文献目录:
每位注册的同学从目录内挑选一篇论文,精读并准备课堂报告。课程要求每一同学所报告的论文篇幅不短于15页(英文),故短于15页的论文(目录内有大约15篇),必须再从同一主题内挑选其他论文以补足。若该主题内已经没有短论文可供选择,则老师将为该同学指定难度较高的短论文阅读和报告。所选论文(目录内有两篇)长度超过45页的同学,可以自己与其他同学联系,做“两人报告”。
注意:每一主题的4-6篇论文中,最重要的始终是第一篇。所以,在课堂报告时,第一篇论文被允许占用更长的时间。


Week One:
1.    J. Tooby and L. Cosmides,1990,“on the universality of human nature and the uniqueness of the individual”,《Journal of Personality》vol. 58,no. 1:17-67.
2.    M. Bekoff,2001,“social play behavior:cooperation,fairness,trust,and the evolution of morality”,《Journal of Consciousness Studies》vol. 8,no. 2,pp. 81-90. ——问题:动物的社会交往也有指导个体认知行为的场景知识吗?动物的脑神经元网络可否通过社会交往模式建立道德意识?
3.    T. Susi and T. Ziemke,2001,“social cognition,artefacts,and stigmergy”,《Journal of Cognitive Systems Research》vol. 2,pp. 273-290.
4.    H. Kudo and R.I.M. Dunbar,2001,“neocortex size and social network size in primates”,《Animal Behavior》vol. 62,pp. 711-722.
5.    G. Lopez-Bendito and Z. Molnar,2003,“thalamo-cortical development:how are we going to get there?”,《Nature: Reviews》,vol. 4,April,pp. 276-289.
6.    L.R. Vandervert,2003,“how working memory and cognitive modeling functions of the cerebellum contribute to discoveries in mathematics”,《New Ideas in Psychology》vol. 21,pp. 15-29.

为了寻求第一主题的主讲同学,让我增加一些注解:第一主题从生物学开始,旨在说明哈耶克的“三层秩序”命题的第一层次---社会性物种的脑演化及其秩序自发生成了道德意识。但这一部分论文不探讨道德意识的形成与社会交往过程的联系。这一主题的报告人,不必具备医学和神经学的专业知识,因为,这里的论文都不是专业论文,或者,是专业刊物发表的通论。此外,我们在讨论的时候,采用的是“浙大方式”---随时提问和大家随意参与解答,老师以普通参与者的身份随时提问和参与解答。目的在于回到对话的逻各斯---在对话中寻求真理。

Week Two:
1.    V. Smith,2001,“experimental methods in neuro-economics”,《Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science》.
2.    M. Archetti,2003,“a selfish origin for recombination”,《Journal of Theoretical Biology》vol. 223,pp. 335-346.
3.    L.R. Caporael,1996,“coordinating bodies,minds and groups:evolution and human social cognition”,《Journal of social and evolutionary systems》vol. 19,no. 3,pp. 261-275.
4.    J.S. Simons and H.J. Spiers,2003,“prefrontal and medial temporal lobe interactions in long-term memory”《Nature: Reviews》vol. 4,August,pp. 637-648.
5.    L.A. Dugatkin and M. Bekoff,2003,“play and the evolution of fairness:a game theory model”,《Behavioral Processes》vol. 60,pp. 209-214.
6.    M.E. Price,L. Cosmides,J. Tooby,2002,“punitive sentiment as an anti-free rider psychological device”,《Evolution and Human Behavior》vol. 23,pp. 203-231.

Week Three:
1.    T.C. Bergstrom,2002,“evolution of social behavior:individual and group selection”,《Journal of Economic Perspectives》vol. 16,no. 2:67-88.
2.    H.L. Gallagher and C.D. Frith,2003,“functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’”,《Trends in Cognitive Sciences》vol. 7,no. 2,pp. 77-83.
3.    J.A. Joireman,et al.,2003,“perceived rationality,morality,and power of social choice as a function of interdependence structure and social value orientation”,《European Journal of Social Psychology》vol. 33,pp. 413-437.
4.    V. Smith,2003,“constructivist and ecological rationality in economics”,address to the 2002 Nobel Prize conference.
5.    A.J. Robson,2002,“evolution and human nature”,《Journal of Economic Perspectives》vol. 16,no. 2,pp. 89-106.

Week Four:
1.    D. Lewis,R. McLain,A. Weigert,1993,“vital realism and sociology: a meta-theoretical grounding in Mead,Ortega,and Schutz”,《Sociological Theory》vol. 11,no. 1: 72-95.
2.    A. Schuetz,1945,“on multiple realities”,《Philosophy and Phenomenological Research》vol. 5,no. 4,pp. 533-576.
3.    A. Schuetz,1951,“choosing among projects of action”《Philosophy and Phenomenological Research》vol. 12,no. 2,pp. 161-184.
4.    A. Schuetz,1954,“concept and theory formation in the social sciences”,《The Journal of Philosophy》vol. 51,no. 9,pp. 257-273.
5.    E. Goffman,1983,“The Interaction Order”,《American Sociological Review》vol. 48,no. 1,pp. 1-17.

第四主题以许茨的现象学社会学理论为重点内容,通过第1篇论文,我们从米德过渡到许茨。再从第5篇论文,我们过渡到高夫曼的“交往秩序”理论。



[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-3 20:19:44编辑过]





[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-3 20:20:27编辑过]





[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-4 8:04:06编辑过]





[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-4 8:53:48编辑过]

 

周斌,你提的问题很重要,我觉得我应当公开回答你的问题:
1,我们确实要求每一位同学都积极发言,连续两次不发言的同学,自动取消资格。现在这一规定仍然有效。同学们为每次讨论准备一份问题的清单,不是论文提纲,即带着阅读时产生的问题参加讨论班。浙大的经验表明,这样的讨论最有成效。
2,你选择的主题是:8.R.B. Myerson,1999,“Nash equilibrium and the history of economic theory”,《Journal of Economic Literature》vol. XXXVII September,pp. 1067-1082.”也就是说,第八讲的主题,如果我们把你的选题贴在此处,三天内无人提出争议,这个主题就是你的了。你选择的这篇论文,16页,刚好达到要求,不必再选其他文章。三天后,没有提出争议,我就通过电子信箱给你这篇论文。
祝好
丁丁

下面贴出目录的第二部分:
Week Five:
1.    H. Gintis,2002,“the puzzle of prosociality”,Santa Fe Institute working papers.
2.    R. Adolphs,2001,“the neurobiology of social cognition”,《Current Opinion in Neurobiology》vol. 11,pp. 231-239.
3.    G. Silverberg,“evolutionary modeling in economics: recent history and immediate prospects”,paper submitted to the Workshop on Evolutionary Economics as a Scientific Research Programme,Stockholm,May 26-27,1997.
4.    J.M. Buchanan and V.J. Vanberg,2002,“constitutional implications of radical subjectivism”,《The Review of Austrian Economics》vol. 15,no. 2-3,pp. 121-129.
5.    H. Gintis,S. Bowles,R. Boyd,E. Fehr,2003,“explaining altruistic behavior in humans”,《Evolution and Human Behavior》 vol. 24,pp. 153-172.
6.    H. Gintis,2003,“towards a unity of the human behavioral sciences”,Santa Fe Institute,working paper.

干脆,多提供些解释吧:第五主题的用心,是引进“基因与文化”共生演化的思路。这一思路的文献主要发表在理论生物学和桑塔菲学派的刊物上,最近也进入了主流经济学刊物。列在这一主题内的文章,旨在探讨个体生物的趋社会性的起源。

Week Six:
1.    K.H. Tucker,1993,“aesthetics, play, and cultural memory: Giddens and Habermas on the postmodern challenge”,《Sociological Theory》vol. 11,no. 2: 194-211.
2.    A. Adler,1931,“mind and body”,ch.2,《What Life Should Mean to You》,Unwin Books,1932.
3.    R. Nagele,1982,“the scene of the other:Theodor W. Adorno’s negative dialectic in the context of poststructuralism”,《Boundary 2》vol. 11,no. 1-2,pp. 59-79.
4.    M. Schoolman,1997,“toward a politics of darkness:individuality and its politics in Adorno’s aesthetics”,《Political Theory》vol. 25,no. 1,pp. 57-92.
5.    C. Thomas,1989,“a knowledge that would no be power:Adorno,nostalgia,and the historicity of the musical subject”,《New German Critique》vol. 0,no. 48,pp. 155-175.
6.    T. Huhn,1985,“Adorno’s aesthetics of illusion”,《The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism》vol. 44,no. 2,pp. 181-189.

或许,我应当为选择第六主题的同学提供一些帮助:这一主题的文章,旨在说明新左派知识份子的努力和动机。故以阿多诺思想为核心,辅以哈贝马斯和吉登斯。阿德勒的那篇,提供了必要的心理学知识,也为社会心理学主题适当铺叙。

Week Seven:
1.    Georg Simmel,1910,“how is society possible?”,《American Journal of Sociology》vol. 16,no. 3: 372-391.
2.    Georg Simmel,1945,“the sociology of sociability”,《American Journal of Sociology》vol. 55,no. 3,pp. 254-261.
3.    E. Skidelesky,2003,“from epistemology to cultural criticism: Georg Simmel and Ernst Carssirer”,《History of European Ideas》vol. 29,pp. 365-381.
4.    C. Kadushin,2002,“the motivational foundation of social networks”,《Social Networks》vol. 24,pp. 77-91.
5.    A. Gare,2001,“process philosophy and the emergent theory of mind: Whitehead,Lloyd Morgan,and Schelling”,a working paper from the author.
6.    Moll,et al.,2002,“functional networks in emotional moral and nonmoral social judgments”,《NeuroImage》vol. 16,pp. 696-703.

第七主题其实是从许茨的“现象学社会学”,经过齐美尔提出的“社会科学根本问题”,过渡到伯格森-詹姆士-怀特海这一系的发生过程的哲学。我认为最关键的过渡环节在于:现象学社会学必须借助“社会网络”的理论,才最终建构为发生过程的哲学。在时间上,许茨和怀特海都无法借助社会网络理论,后者在1974年正式出场,最近才借助半群理论进入应用代数学的议题。但我仍然相信,北大社会学系的同学能够从这一主题的报告中获得极大收益---理论方面的。我必须指出,这一主题或许是,或许将是,我们这一研究班课程的最重要的部分。可惜,“过程哲学”难度较高,我不知道有谁可以胜任该报告?


Week Eight:
1.    R.B. Myerson,1999,“Nash equilibrium and the history of economic theory”,《Journal of Economic Literature》vol. XXXVII September,pp. 1067-1082.
2.    R.B. Myerson,2002,“an interview with Roger Myerson on Nash and game theory”,in P. Raptis,ed.《Game Theory: An Afieroma to John Nash》.
3.    L. Samuelson,1996,“bounded rationality and game theory”,《The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance》vol. 36,special issue,pp. 17-35.
4.    M.O. Jackson and A. Watts,2002,“on the formation of interaction networks in social coordination games”,《Games and Economic Behavior》vol. 41,pp. 265-291.
5.    J.C. Mitchell,1974,“social networks”,《Annual Review of Anthropology》vol. 3,pp. 279-299.
6.    R.E. Nelson,1989,“the strength of strong ties: social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations”,《The Academy of Management Journal》vol. 32,no. 2,pp. 377-401.

第八主题的文献大多是经济学的,但我插入了理论社会学的讨论,例如1974年那篇论文。借助于博弈论,社会网络的数学讨论得以展开,例如2002年的那篇论文。


[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-3 20:00:47编辑过]





[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-4 8:11:52编辑过]





[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-4 8:14:30编辑过]





[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-4 8:17:57编辑过]





[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-4 8:23:56编辑过]





[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-4 8:56:41编辑过]

 

鄂文君已经于前天选择了下面这个主题:

15.S. Bowles,1998,“endogenous preferences: the cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions”,《Journal of Economic Literature》vol. 36,no. 1: 75-111.

下面贴出目录的第三部分:

Week Nine:
1.    F.A. Hayek,1936,“economics and knowledge”,Presidential address to Londen Economics Club,reprinted in《Economica》vol. IV,pp. 33-54.
2.    F.A. Hayek,1943,“the facts of the social sciences”,《Ethics》vol. 54,no. 1,pp. 1-13.
3.    F.A. Hayek,1945,“the use of knowledge in society”,《American Economic Review》vol. 35,no. 4,pp. 519-530.
4.    F.A. Hayek,1989,“the pretence of knowledge”,《American Economic Review》vol. 79,no. 6,pp. 3-7.
5.    P.J. Boettke,2002,“information and knowledge: Austrian economics in search of its uniqueness”,《The Review of Austrian Economics》vol. 15,no. 4,pp. 263-274.
6.    H. Demmert,D.B. Klein,2003,“experiment on entrepreneurial discovery: an attempt to demonstrate the conjecture of Hayek and Kirzner”,《Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization》vol. 50,pp. 295-310.

Week Ten:
1.    G. Becker,K. Murphy,1992,“the division of labor, coordination costs, and knowledge”,《Quarterly Journal of Economics》,vol. 107,no.4: 1137-1160.
2.    A.A. Alchian,1950,“uncertainty,evolution,and economic theory”,《Journal of Political Economy》vol. 58,no. 3,pp. 211-221.
3.    G. Becker,1993,“the economic way of looking at behavior”,《Journal of Political Economy》vol. 101,no. 3,pp. 385-409.
4.    G.J. Stigler and G. Becker,1977,“de gustibus non est disputandum”(权且译作“a defence for hypothesis of the stability of taste”),《American Economic Review》vol. 67,no. 2,pp. 76-90.
5.    D.K. Gode and S. Sunder,1997,“what makes markets allocationally efficient?”《Quarterly Journal of Economics》vol. 112,no. 2,pp. 603-630.
6.    V. Smith,2002,“markets,institutions and experiments”,in《Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science》.

Week Eleven:
1.    I. Wallerstein,2002,“new revolts against the system”,《The New Left Review》vol. 18,pp. 29-39.
2.    I. Wallerstein,1976,“a world-system perspective on the social sciences”,《The British Journal of Sociology》vol. 27,no. 3,pp. 343-352.
3.    I. Wallerstein,1978,“civilizations and modes of production: conflicts and convergences”,《Theory and Society》vol. 5,no. 1,pp. 1-10.
4.    K.P. Moseley and I. Wallerstein,1978,“precapitalist social structures”,《Annual Review of Sociology》vol. 4,pp. 259-290.
5.    I. Wallerstein,1997,“social science and the quest for a just society”,《The American Journal of Sociology》vol. 102,no. 5,pp. 1241-1257.
6.    G. Simmel,1909,“the problem of sociology”,《American Journal of Sociology》vol. 15,no. 3,pp. 289-320.

第十一主题是我们研究班对“新左派”论题的再度探讨,这次以华伦斯坦对社会科学思想的反思为主,但增加了齐美尔1909年的一篇综述论文。

Week Twelve:
1.    H. Blumer,1986,“society as symbolic interaction”;G. H. Mead,1930,“Mind, Self, and Society”.
2.    J. Lopreato,1990,“from social evolutionism to biocultural evolutionism”,《Sociological Forum》vol. 5,no. 2,pp. 187-212.
3.    D.R. Bhandari,1998,“existentialist perception of the human condition: with special reference to Sartre”,paper submitted to the 20th World Philosophy Conference.
4.    L. Zsolnai,1998,“rational choice and the diversity of choices”,《Journal of Socio-Economics》vol. 27,no. 5,pp. 613-622.
5.    L. Wittgenstein,1965,“I:  a lecture on ethics”,《The Philosophical Review》vol. 74,no. 1,pp. 3-12.
6.    C.S. Henshilwood,et al.,2001,“an early bone tool industry from the middle stone age at Blombos Cave,South Africa: implications for the origins of modern human behavior,symbolism and language”,《Journal of Human Evolution》vol. 41,pp. 631-678.

第十二主题正式进入符号交往理论的论域。注意我增加了维特根斯坦中期的一篇重要文章,作为符号理论的一个脚注。我又增加了一篇文化人类学的考古学论文,旨在提供“符号”的现实世界一个说明。


[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-3 20:01:52编辑过]





[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-4 8:29:11编辑过]

 

此外,请那位前不久选择了布鲁默和米德符号交往主义课题的同学马上与我取得联系,并准备一个不小于5MB的信箱地址。


下面是目录的第四部分:

Week Thirteen:
1.    W.N. Butos,T.J. McQuade,1999,“mind, market, and institutions: the knowledge problem in Hayek’s thought”,working paper,william.butos@trincoll.edu.
2.    S. Huck,et al.,2003,“zero-knowledge cooperation in dilemma games”,《Journal of Theoretical Biology》vol. 220,pp. 47-54.
3.    I. Kant,1785,“fundamental principles of the metaphysic of morals”.
4.    E.B. Royzman and R. Kumar,2001,“on the relative preponderance of empathic sorrow and its relation to commonsense morality”,《New Ideas in Psychology》vol. 19,pp. 131-144.

第十三主题的主要论文是第1篇哈耶克“三层次秩序”思想的说明,和第3篇,康德道德哲学引论。我增加了另外两篇,为说明道德演化的现实过程和博弈论模型。于是,这里出现了演化理论与康德哲学之间的紧张关系。其实,这一紧张关系从始至终伴随了全部主题。

Week Fourteen:
1.    G.E. Swanson,1961,“Mead and Freud: their relevance for social psychology”,《Sociometry》vol. 24,no. 4: 319-339.
2.    G.R. Semin and E.R. Smith,2002,“interfaces of social psychology with situated and embodied cognition”,《Cognitive Systems Research》vol. 3,pp. 385-396.
3.    B.J. McAuliffe,et al.,2003,“individualist and collectivist norms: when it’s ok to go your own way”,《European Journal of Social Psychology》vol. 33,pp. 57-70.
4.    H-J Mosler and W.M. Brucks,2003,“integrating commons dilemma findings in a general dynamic model of cooperative behavior in resource crises”,《European Journal of Social Psychology》vol. 33,pp. 119-133.

第十四主题正式进入了社会心理学论域,以第1篇论文最为重要。2003年的那两篇论文提供了社会心理学的现实案例的研究,与经济学家关注的“囚徒困境”联系密切。第2篇论文勾连着梅洛-庞蒂的身体现象学、哈贝马斯的交往理性、和当代社会心理学。

Week Fifteen:
1.    S. Bowles,1998,“endogenous preferences: the cultural consequences of markets and other economic institutions”,《Journal of Economic Literature》vol. 36,no. 1: 75-111.
2.    R.A. Makkreel,2003,“the cognition-knowledge distinction in Kant and Dilthey and the implications for psychology and self-understanding”,《Studies in History and Philosophy of Science》 vol. 34,pp. 149-164.
3.    L.A. Dugatkin,et al.,2003,“the evolution of group-beneficial traits in the absence of between group selection”,《Journal of Theoretical Biology》vol. 220,pp. 67-74.
4.    D. Postles,2001,“small gifts,but big rewards: the symbolism of some gifts to the religious”,《Journal of Medieval History》vol. 27,pp. 23-42.

第十五主题提供了自利和利他行为的历史的和演化论的注释。其中,第2篇论文有新意(2003年发表),比较了康德与狄尔泰哲学立场的差异,由此进入社会心理学和对自我意识的重新理解。


Week Sixteen:
1.    W. Singer,1998,“consciousness and the structure of neuronal representations”,《Philosophical Translations of Royal Society》vol. 353: 1829-1840.
2.    M. Granovetter,1983,“the strength of weak ties: a network theory revisited”,《Sociological Theory》vol. 1,pp. 201-233.
3.    M. Granovetter,1985,“economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness”,《The American Journal of Sociology》vol. 91,no. 3,pp. 481-510.
4.    R.J.R. Blair,1995,“a cognitive developmental approach to morality: investigating the psychopath”,《Cognition》vol. 57,pp. 1-29.

这一主题以Granovetter为重心,受了远在德国的“K”和现在杭州的“萧敢”的对话的启发。但是,我仍然觉得第1篇是核心的论文。


Week Seventeen:
1.    P.J. Richerson,R.T. Boyd,J. Henrich,2002,“cultural evolution of human cooperation”,ch. 19,in 《Genetic and Cultural Evolution》,ed. by Peter Hammerstein,MIT Press,,pp. 373-404.
2.    J. Henrich and R. Boyd,2001,“on modeling cognition and culture: why cultural evolution does not require replication of representations”,《Culture and Cognition》,forthcoming.
3.    A. Caplin and B. Nalebuff,1992,“individuals and institutions”,《The American Economic Review》vol. 82,no. 2,pp. 317-322.
4.    H.P. Young,2002,“on the limits to rational learning”,《European Economic Review》vol. 46,pp. 791-799.
5.    A. Stefanescu,1997,“impossibility results for choice correspondences”,《Mathematical Social Sciences》vol. 33,pp. 129-148.

这是最后一个主题,它探究人类“理性”的根本问题,这一问题已经被博弈论基础学者提出来,但最近才有所进展,例如第4篇论文。基于理性本身的问题性,社会选择理论当然也有相关的问题性,即第5篇论文所综述的内容。说实话,我并不指望这一主题的文章都能够被国内学者和同学们理解。


[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-3 20:04:09编辑过]





[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-4 8:48:59编辑过]

 

经过解释,感觉清晰了一些,但通过法兰克福学派来解释新左派,我感觉会读得很累。我最近在补习现象学,读海德格尔,感觉刚刚稍微理清楚“现象学社会学”的思路。
 

萧敢,新左派的文章,如果你读了他们当中比较出色的,你就会同意:他们要寻求的,无非就是当时阿多诺他们要寻求的。用马尔库赛的话说,是以“审美人生”来取缔资本主义权力意志的人生。
 

谢谢,我有些明白了。
另外,大家读现象学的时候,从Schuetz入手是否合适呢?如果不直接去碰胡塞尔和海德格尔,恐怕对现象学的理解就很难准确到位。

第七主题其实是从许茨的“现象学社会学”,经过齐美尔提出的“社会科学根本问题”,过渡到伯格森-詹姆士-怀特海这一系的发生过程的哲学。我认为最关键的过渡环节在于:现象学社会学必须借助“社会网络”的理论,才最终建构为发生过程的哲学。在时间上,许茨和怀特海都无法借助社会网络理论,后者在1974年正式出场,最近才借助半群理论进入应用代数学的议题。但我仍然相信,北大社会学系的同学能够从这一主题的报告中获得极大收益---理论方面的。我必须指出,这一主题或许是,或许将是,我们这一研究班课程的最重要的部分。可惜,“过程哲学”难度较高,我不知道有谁可以胜任该报告?

这一部分也是我最有兴趣的。最近兔子做了大量的格论笔记,他觉得好象经济学家在使用这一工具时有很多问题,我在向他学习。
 

萧敢,不是读现象学,而是为了社会理论读现象学,所以直接就是许茨,追溯到胡塞尔就很困难了,没有精力呀。
让兔子去读半群理论在社会网络理论中的应用的文献。他已经转到我们这里了吗?


[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-4 9:30:10编辑过]

 

汪老师,兔子还没转过来,还在办理。
昨天我们还在讨论应该多去玉泉听数学课还是在西溪多听哲学课呢。
我刚刚读完一篇关于semigroup apply into social network的文章,自以为大致看懂了。但我有很多疑问。这套理论是讨论组织关系的,它没有基于数学的微观基础。使用的是二进制矩阵(或者图论也一样),所以要求两人之间的关系必须被抽象地两分。它能否和微观经济理论兼容呢(贝克尔的“积聚理论”似乎有希望)
此外,这种分析方法是静态的,能否用马尔可夫链把它动态化?
我还是觉得维度太少,分析起来太单薄,不见得能比game theory得出更多的结论。

在这个领域,UC-Irving的John Boyd(不是我们熟悉的Santafe的R.Boyd,虽然也是人类学家)好象比较活跃。

下面我转贴一篇clustering and blockmodling的阅读列表

Clustering and Blockmodeling
Vladimir Batagelj
University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
June 28, 2002
References
[1] Aarts, E. & Lenstra, J.K. (Eds.)(1997). Local Search in Combinatorial Optimization.
Wiley, Chichester.
[2] Anderberg, M.R. (1973), Cluster analysis for applications. Probability and
mathematical statistics, vol.19. Academic Press, New York.
[3] Batagelj, V. (1981), Note on ultrametric hierarchical clustering algorithms.
Psychometrika, 46(3), 351-352.
[4] Batagelj, V. (1984), Notes on the dynamic clusters method, in Proceedings
of the 4th Conference on Applied Mathematics 1984, Split, University of
Split, 1985, 139-146.
[5] Batagelj, V. (1985), Algorithmic aspects of clustering problem, Proceedings
of 7th International Symposium îComputer at the Universityî, Cavtat 1985,
SRCE, Zagreb, p. 502 1 - 502 15.
[6] Batagelj, V. (1986), On adding clustering algorithms. COMPSTAT 86, short
communications, Rome.
[7] Batagelj, V. (1988), Generalized Ward and related clustering problems. In:
Bock, H.H. (Ed.): Classication and related methods of data analysis, North-
Holland, Amsterdam, p. 67ñ74.
[8] Batagelj, V. (1989), Similarity measures between structured objects, in A.
Graovac (Ed.), Proceedings MATH/CHEM/COMP 1988, Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia
20-25 June 1988, Studies in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry.
Vol 63, pp. 25-40, Amsterdam: Elsevier.
1
[9] Batagelj, V., Pisanski, T., and Simòoes-Pereira, J.M.S. (1990), An algorithm
for tree-realizability of distance matrices. International Journal of Computer
Mathematics, 34, pp. 171-176.
[10] Batagelj, V., Ferligoj, A., and Doreian, P. (1992), Direct and Indirect Methods
for Structural Equivalence. Social Networks 14, 63-90.
[11] Batagelj, V., Doreian, P., and Ferligoj, A. (1992), An Optimizational Approach
to Regular Equivalence. Social Networks 14, 121-135.
[12] Batagelj, V., Korenjak-  Cerne, S., and Klavzar, S. (1994) Dynamic Programming
and Convex Clustering. Algorithmica 11, 93-103.
[13] Batagelj, V. (1994), Semirings for Social Networks Analysis. Journal of
Mathematical Socilogy, 191, 53-68.
[14] Batagelj, V., and Bren, M. (1995), Comparing Resemblance Measures, Journal
of Classication, 12(1), 73-90.
[15] Batagelj, V. (1997), Notes on blockmodeling. Social Networks 19, 143-155.
[16] Batagelj, V., Mrvar, A. and Zaversnik, M. (1999), Partitioning approach to
visualization of large graphs, In Kratochv¥l, J. (ed), Lecture notes in computer
science, 1731, Springer, Berlin, 90ñ97.
[17] Batagelj, V., and Mrvar, A. (2001), A subquadratic triad census algorithm for
large sparse networks with small maximum degree. Social networks, 23(3),
237-243.
[18] Batagelj, V. and Zaversnik, M. (2002) Generalized cores, submitted.
[19] Batagelj, V. and Zaversnik, M. (2002) Triangular connectivity and its generalizations,
in preparation.
[20] Benz¥ecri, J.P. (1976), L'analyse des donnees, Tome 1., 2., Paris: Dunod.
[21] Bock, H.H. and Diday, E., (Eds.) (2000), Analysis of Symbolic Data. Exploratory
methods for extracting statistical information from complex data.
Springer, Heidelberg.
[22] Borgatti, S.P., and Everett, M.G. (1989), The Class of all Regular Equivalences:
Algebraic Structure and Computation, Social Networks, 11, 65-88.
[23] Borgatti, S.P., and Everett, M.G. (1992). Notions of positions in social network
analysis. In P. V. Marsden (Ed.), Sociological Methodology (pp. 1ñ35).
San Francisco: Jossey-bass.
2
[24] Boyd, J.P. (1991). Social Semigroups. A Unied Theory of Scaling and
Blockmodelling as Applied to Social Networks. Fairfax: George Mason University
Press.
[25] Brigham, R.C., and Dutton, R.D. (1985). A compilation of relations between
graph invariants. Networks, 15, 73ñ107.
[26] Brucker, P. (1978), On the complexity of clustering problems, in Optimization
and Operations Research, Proceedings, Bonn 1977, in Lecture Notes in
Economics and Mathematical Systems, Vol. 157, eds. R.Henn, B. Korte and
W. Oettli, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
[27] Bruynooghe, M. (1977), M¥ethodes nouvelles en classication automatique
des donn¥ees taxinomiques nombreuses. Statistique et Analyse des Donn¥ees,
3, 24-42.
[28] Carr¥e, B. (1979). Graphs and Networks. Oxford: Clarendon.
[29] E. Ch¥avez, G. Navarro, R. Baeza-Yates, and J. Marroqu'in (1999). Searching
in Metric Spaces. Technical Report TR/DCC-99-3, Dept. of Computer
Science, Univ. of Chile.
http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/avez99searching.html
[30] De Nooy, W., Mrvar A., Batagelj, V. (2002), Exploratory Social Network
Analysis with Pajek. Manuscript of a textbook.
[31] Degenne, A., and Forse¥e, M. (1999), Introducing social networks, London:
Sage.
[32] Dickerson M.T., and Eppstein D. (1996), Algorithms for proximity problems
in higher dimensions. Comp. Geom. Theory & Applications 5, 277-291.
http://www.ics.uci.edu/òeppstein/pubs/
a-dickerson.html
[33] Diday, E. et al. (1979), Optimisation en classication automatique, Tome 1.,
2., Rocquencourt: INRIA.
[34] Dieudonne, J. (1960), Foundations of modern analysis. Academic Press,
New York.
[35] Doreian, P., Batagelj, V., Ferligoj, A. (2000), Symmetric-acyclic decompositions
of networks. J. classif., 17(1), 3-28.
3
[36] Doreian, P., Batagelj, V., Ferligoj, A. (2001), Positional analyses of sociometric
data. Chapter for the book: Models and methods in social network
analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press (forthcoming).
[37] Doreian, P., Batagelj, V., Ferligoj, A. (2002), Generalized blockmodeling.
Manuscript of a book.
[38] Doreian, P., Fujimoto K. (2001), Structures of Supreme Court Voting. University
of Pittsburgh, manuscript, version November 3, 2001.
[39] Doreian, P., and Mrvar, A. (1996). A partitioning approach to structural balance.
Social Networks, 18, 149ñ168.
[40] Esfahanian A-H., On the Evolution of Graph Connectivity Algorithms.
http://www.cse.msu.edu/òesfahani/
book chapter/Graph connectivity chapter.pdf
[41] Everett, M.G. (1983), EBLOC: A graph theoretic blocking algorithm for
social networks. Social Networks 5, 323-346.
[42] Everett, M.E and Borgatti, S.P. (1996), Exact Colorations of Graphs and
Digraphs. Social Networks, 18, 319-331.
[43] Everitt, B. (1974), Cluster Analysis. Heinemann Educational Books LTD.,
London.
[44] Fuast, K. (1988), Comparison of Methods for Positional Analysis: Structural
and General Equivalences, Social Networks, 10, 313-341.
[45] Ferligoj A., Batagelj V. (1982), Clustering with relational constraint. Psychometrika,
47(4), 413-426.
[46] Ferligoj A., Batagelj V. (1983), Some types of clustering with relational constraints.
Psychometrika, 48(4), 541-552.
[47] Ferligoj, A., and Batagelj, V. (1992), Direct Multicriteria Clustering Algorithms.
Journal of Classication, 9(1), 43-61.
[48] Fisher,W.D. (1958), On grouping for maximum homogeneity. Journal of the
American Statistical Association, 53, 789-798.
[49] Fukunaga, K., Narendra, P.M. (1975), A branch and bound algorithm for
computing k-nearest neighbors. IEEE Transactions on Computers, C-24,
750-753.
4
[50] Ganti V. etal. (1998), Clustering large datasets in arbitrary metric spaces.
http://www.cs.wisc.edu/ vganti/pubs.html
[51] Garey, M.R. and Johnson, D.S. (1979), Computer and intractability, San
Francisco: Freeman.
[52] Godehardt, E. (1988), Graphs as Structural Models, Brounschweig: Vieweg.
[53] Gordon, A.D.(1981), Classication. Monographs on Applied Probability
and Statistics. Chapman and Hall, London.
[54] Gordon, A.D. (1996). A survey of constrained classication. Computational
Statistics & Data Analysis, 21, 17ñ29.
[55] Gower, J.C.(1971), A general coefcient of similarity and some of its properties.
Biometrics 27, 857-871.
[56] Harary, F, Norman, R.Z., and Cartwright, D. (1965), Structural Models: An
Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs, New York: Wiley.
[57] Harel, D., and Koren, J. (2001), On Clustering Using RandomWalks, LNCS
2245, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 18-41.
[58] Hartigan, J.A. (1975), Clustering Algorithms, New York: John-Wiley.
[59] Hub¥alek, Z. (1982), ìCoefcients of association and similarity, based on
binary (presence-absence) data: an evaluationî, Biological Review 57, 669-
689.
[60] Hummon, N.P. &Doreian, P. (1989). Connectivity in a citation network: The
development of dna theory. Social Networks, 11, 39ñ63.
[61] Jambu M., Lebeaux M-O. (1983), Cluster analysis and data analysis, North-
Holland, Amsterdam.
[62] Janowitz, M.F. (1978). An order theoretic model for cluster analysis. SIAM
J. Appl. Math., 34, 55ñ72.
[63] Jardin N., Sibson R.(1971), Mathematical taxonomy. John Wiley, London.
[64] Jensen R.E. (1969), A dynamic programming algorihm for cluster analysis.
Operational research, 7, 1034-1057.
5
[65] Kamvar, S.D., and Klein, D., and Manning, C.D. (2002), Interpreting and
Extending Classical Agglomerative Clustering Algorithms using a Model-
Based Approach. ICML 2002.
http://nlp.stanford.edu/òdanklein/
project-clustering.shtml
[66] Kashyap R.L., Oommen B.J. (1983), A common basis for similarity measures
involving two strings. International Journal of Computer Mathematics
13, 17-40.
[67] Korenjak-  Cerne S. and Batagelj V. (1998), Clustering large datasets of mixed
units, in Rizzi, A., Vichi, M., Bock, H.-H. (Eds.): Advances in Data Science
and Classication. Springer, Berlin, p. 43ñ48.
[68] Levenshtein V.I. (1966), Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions,
and reversals. Soviet Physics - Doklady, 10, 707-710.
[69] Lorrain, F. and H.C. White (1971): Structural equivalence of individuals in
social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1:49ñ80.
[70] Lorrain, F. (1975): R¥eseaux sociaux et classications sociales. Paris: Hermann.
[71] Marriott, F.H.C. (1982), Optimization methods of cluster analysis,
Biometrika,69, 417-421.
[72] Matula D.W.(1977) Graph theoretic techniques for cluster analysis algorithms.
Van Ryzin J. (ed.): Classication and clustering. Academic Press,
New York, 95-127.
[73] Mirkin, B.G. (1980), Analiz kacestvennyh priznakov i struktur, Moskva:
Statistika.
[74] Mirkin, B.G., and Rodin C.N. (1977), Grafy i geny, Moskva: Nauka.
[75] Moody, J. (2001), Peer inuence groups: identifying dense clusters in large
networks. Social Networks 23, 261-283.
[76] Moreno, J.L. (1953), Who shall survive?, Beacon N.Y.: Beacon House.
[77] Murtagh, F. (1985), Multidimensional Clustering Algorithms, Compstat lectures,
4, Vienna: Physica-Verlag.
6
[78] Murtagh, F. (1999), Clustering in Massive Data Sets, Proceedings of the
Beilstein Workshop 2000: Chemical Data Analysis in the Large, May 22nd
- 26th 2000, Bozen, Italy, p. 28-51
http://www.beilstein-institut.de/bozen2000/
proceedings/contents.html
[79] Olson, C.F. (1995), Parallel Algorithm for Hierarchical Clustering, Parallel
computing, 21, 1313-1325.
http://faculty.washington.edu/cfolson/papers.html
[80] Pattison, P.E. (1988), Network Models; Some Comments on Papers in this
Special Issue, Social Networks, 10, 383ñ411.
[81] Pattison, P.E. (1993). Algebraic Models for Social Networks. Cambridge,
England: Cambridge University Press.
[82] Roberts, F.S. (1976), Discrete mathematical models with applications to social,
biological, and environmental problems. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice
Hall.
[83] Schreider, Ju.A. (1975), Equality, resemblance, and order, Moskva: Mir.
[84] Scott, J. (2000), Social Network Analysis: A Handbook, 2nd edition. London:
Sage Publications.
[85] Seidman, S.B., (1983), Network Structure And Minimum Degree. Social
Networks, 5, 269-287.
[86] Shamos, M.I. (1976), Geometry and statistics: Problems at the interface,
in J. Traub (Ed.): Algorithms and Complexity (New directions and recent
results). New York: Academic Press, 251-288.
[87] Sneath P.H.A., Sokal R.R. (1973), Numerical taxonomy. W.H. Freeman and
Company, San Francisco.
[88] Snyder, D., Kick, E. (1979), Structural position in the world system and
economic growth 1955-70: A multiple network analysis of transnational interactions.
American Journal of Sociology 84, 1096-1126.
[89] Sp®ath H. (1977), Cluster Analyse Algorithmen zur Objekt-Klassizierung
und Datenreduction. R. Oldenbourg, M®unchen.
[90] Trinajsti¥c, N. (1983), Chemical graph theory, Vol. 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton.
7
[91] Van Cutsem, B., ed. (1994), Classication and Dissimilarity Analysis, Lecture
Notes in Statistics, New York: Springer Verlag.
[92] Ward, J.H. (1963), Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function,
American Statistical Association Journal,58, 236-244.
[93] Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and
Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[94] White, D.R. and K.P. Reitz (1983), Graph and semigroup homomorphisms
on networks of relations. Social Networks, 5:193ñ234.
[95] Index of clustering papers on the WWW:
http://www.ece.nwu.edu/òharsha/Clustering/clus.html
8
 
1  /  17  页   12345678» 跳转

版权所有 北望经济学园  北望博客  Sitemap

Powered by Discuz!NT 2.1.202    Copyright © 2001-2012 Comsenz Inc.
Processed in 0.140625 second(s) , 4 queries. 京ICP备05006035号
返顶部